![asus eee pc 701 surf asus eee pc 701 surf](https://images.reevoo.com/products/40/40343/268x268.jpg)
So you might be able to replace your slow device with something more capable - the mod community seems quite active around netbooks so if it is possible a quick search should find a few good tutorials.Īs well as the drive space differential (4/8/16 Mb compared to ~160), the slow speed of cheap SSDs and the expense of faster ones is why SSD based netbooks are becoming rarer - the buying public prefer the storage space and write speed of a spinning disk over the random access speed and no-moving-parts-y-ness of an SSD at the same price, particularly when running Windows (which, especially with a small amount of RAM, seem much worse affected by the slow write speed than Linux in my limited experience of Windows on these things and needs more space to be useful).1GB ASUS EEE PC 701 2G 4G SURF Memory DDR2 SODIMM RAMġ8Christmas Deer Home Decor Printing whale Cushion Cover Cotton Linen pillow cas. I don't know about the EEE models like your's but the Acer's SSD is a standard 1.3" PATA device with ZIF connector, so can be replaced if you dare pull it apart (I keep considering treating myself to something like this, but money is short right now and my 2x USB mSD arrangement is proving more the sufficient for the time being).
ASUS EEE PC 701 SURF BLUETOOTH
The micro card readers are small enough to leave plugged in constantly (though it does mean I lose two USB ports, but more of the time this is fine as it leaves on free for bluetooth / a mouse / another drive and for other times I carry a small USB hub). many small reads and writes rather than bulk operations), but the speed difference in the system's general responsiveness is definitely significant in general use. Again I've not got around to doing performance tests for more usual and/or more random I/O patterns (i.e. The overall bulk read speed is about the same as the built-in SSD (~32Mbyte/sec) but the bulk write is much better (varying between 12 and 16Mbyte/sec) though I expect this to drop over time. I've actually got Ubuntu installed on a pair of them using RAID0. I found some microSD cards I had wrote faster in the mini USB adaptors I have them in (like these).
![asus eee pc 701 surf asus eee pc 701 surf](https://www.njuskalo.hr/image-w920x690/asus-prijenosnici/asus-eeepc-701-4g-surf-slika-92101227.jpg)
I've not tested more random access patterns - I expect it will fair better in such tests as this is where even slow SSDs tend to do well against mechanical drives. The bulk read speeds were more acceptable (and a lot better than most USB sticks) though at ~32MByte/sec. If I test the internal SSD of my Acer Aspire One, by write a large chunk of data then running sync to ensure all is written and timing the whole operation, I see a bulk write rate of a little less than 4Mbyte/second which is very slow.
ASUS EEE PC 701 SURF PORTABLE
USB memory sticks are SSDs, just made with different priorities (cheap + portable + just fast enough). I would not be surprised to find the SSD in your machine is using the same RAM chips and controller as found in some USB memory sticks.
![asus eee pc 701 surf asus eee pc 701 surf](https://images.icecat.biz/img/norm/high/1611166-768.jpg)
The SSDs in netbooks are not the expensive blazing fast variety, and their performance can degrade over time just like their faster, more expensive, contemporaries.